You should probably ponder over who is to blame in the situation of the sidewalk fall lawsuit. If you slipped and fell on a broken sidewalk, several people could be held responsible.
It seems that in case a sidewalk defect is connected with some private property, the owner can be held responsible for not removing the potential threat.
The sidewalk belongs to the local government or city and this is why proving negligence on the part of a municipality is somewhat difficult, but essential if one wants to sue for damages. A professional slip and fall lawyer can be helpful in establishing the participant legally accountable for it.
Maintenance companies and street cleaning companies may be held jointly negligent where they both failed in their duty to remove items that obstruct the road or in reconstructing parts of a road which are dangerous to drive on.
To hold a party accountable, you must demonstrate that they failed to uphold their duty of care:
To protect your health and strengthen a sidewalk fall lawsuit, there are several steps to take:
Seek Immediate Medical Help
Failure to document the injuries right away can significantly harm your case and your health, thus the need to do so. However, under no circumstance should you neglect your wellbeing- this is for those who do not feel the effects of your injuries immediately upon sustaining them.
Report the Incident
In case of the location of the incidence, tender the information to city administrators, police agencies or property managers. You should always request an accident report; an official document it may be.
Gather Evidence
Record the incidence through the use of camera, acquire information of each witness, and make records.
Seek Legal Advice
Slip and fall lawyers can be of immense assistance when it comes to issues of liability – in case you are dealing with the government.
In fact, if you did not notice the hazard early enough, you may still file a claim, but your case will be a bit complex. The key issue is whether a “reasonable person” in the same situation would have seen the hazard:
Contributory or Comparative Negligence: It may be to your detriment if you are a resident of a particular state because if you are partly at fault then your share will be deducted. Supposing you were using a phone and did not see a visible danger, the defense is likely to claim that you caused the crash. This, however, does not stop you from seeking an award.
Objective Standards: The burden shifting test, in addition to asking what a reasonable person would have been able to see and avoid the hazard if exercising ordinary care, is frequently used in courts. This could certainly help your cause if the danger was latent or hard to detect. Presenting, for instance, photographs showing the area of the hazard or statements from the witnesses that can attest that the danger was not conspicuous.
A professional attorney for the more specific case can guide you better!